Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC BY
dc.contributor.authorNenadović, Katarina
dc.contributor.authorBugarski, Dejan
dc.contributor.authorIlić, Tamara
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-25T09:09:06Z
dc.date.available2026-06-25T09:09:06Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.identifier.issn2306-7381
dc.identifier.urihttps://repo.niv.ns.ac.rs/xmlui/handle/123456789/1139
dc.description.abstractBackground: While traditional pasture-based systems offer sheep natural living conditions and freedom, barn farming provides greater environmental control and protection. The choice of farming system is a crucial factor directly affecting the physical and mental health of the animals. Aim: This study evaluated welfare indicators and parasite prevalence in different sheep management systems, examining the impact of parasitic infections on ewe welfare. Methods: Conducted from November 2025 to April 2026 across 26 farms (13 confined and 13 pasture), the study individually assessed a sample of 1192 ewes aged 2–7 years. Animal-based welfare indicators were assessed using the AWIN protocol for sheep, while parasitic infections were determined from fecal sampling. Results: The results revealed significant differences (p < 0.001) between the systems. Pasture farms showed a higher prevalence of soiled fleece (60.14%), skin lesions, ocular and nasal discharge (6.35%; 31.22%), respiratory issues (16.75%), fecal soiling (16.23%), borderline anemia (16.23%), and excessive itching (16.23%). In contrast, confined systems exhibited higher prevalence of fleece loss (36.00%), hoof overgrowth (20.96%), udder asymmetry (1.44%), and wool pulling (8.32%). Identified parasites included Eimeria spp., gastrointestinal strongyles, Trichuris ovis, Dictyocaulus filarial, Muellerius capillaris, Protostrongylus rufescens, Moniezia spp., Dicrocoelium dendriticum, Fasciola hepatica, Paramphistomum spp., and Giardia intestinalis. Significant correlations (p < 0.001) were found between certain welfare indicators and parasite infections in confined systems, such as between thin body condition score and Eimeria spp., and between fleece quality and fecal soiling with gastrointestinal strongyles, while in pasture systems, thin BCS, nasal discharge, and respiration quality correlated with Muellerius capillaris, borderline anemia with Trichuris ovis and Dictyocaulus filaria, and fecal soiling with Eimeria spp. and Dicrocoelium dendriticum. Conclusions: This data underscores the critical need to improve ewe welfare and implement targeted parasite control strategies in both farming systems.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Contract numbers 451-03-34/2026-03/200143: 451-03-33/2026-03/200031).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publishermdpien_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceVeterinary Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectsheep welfareen_US
dc.subjectAWIN protocol for sheepen_US
dc.subjectconfined farmingen_US
dc.subjectpasture farmingen_US
dc.subjectparasitic infectionsen_US
dc.titleSheep Welfare in Confined and Pasture Production Systems: A Comparative Study with Emphasis on Parasitological Statusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/vetsci13060589
dc.citation.volume13en_US
dc.citation.issue589en_US
dc.citation.rankM21en_US
dc.type.versionpublisheden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY