Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC BY
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Mariana
dc.contributor.authorPozio, Edoardo
dc.contributor.authorVeneziano, Vincenzo
dc.contributor.authorJansen, Famke
dc.contributor.authorLazou, Thomai
dc.contributor.authorDan, Sorin Daniel
dc.contributor.authorRozycki, Miroslaw
dc.contributor.authorPetrović, Jelena
dc.contributor.authorVieira-Pinto, Madalena
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-09T06:51:32Z
dc.date.available2026-09-09T06:51:32Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.identifier.issn2405-6766
dc.identifier.urihttps://repo.niv.ns.ac.rs/xmlui/handle/123456789/1163
dc.description.abstractPrivate consumption of wild boar meat is increasingly widespread across Europe. Notably, only a small proportion of hunted game is processed through approved establishments, while the majority is intended for private consumption. Testing wild boar meat for Trichinella spp. is mandatory when the meat is placed on the market. However, for private consumption this testing may not be carried out, raising public health concerns due to the risk of Trichinella spp. infection. To assess this risk, a survey was conducted in 26 European countries to collect data on the number of hunted wild boars (Sus scrofa) intended for private consumption and the prevalence of Trichinella spp. in wild boars, and to compare legislation and operational practices related to testing requirements, sample handling, diagnostic methods, training requirements, reporting procedures, mandatory measures for positive samples, penalties for non-compliance, and awareness-raising activities. Findings revealed significant heterogeneity in testing obligations, sample handling procedures, laboratory requirements, and enforcement mechanisms. While some countries mandate systematic testing and subsidize costs, others rely on voluntary testing or impose no requirements, leaving consumers at higher risk. Reported prevalence of Trichinella spp. in wild boar varied widely, ranging from 0% to over 6% across countries and years, though data availability was often inconsistent. Awareness campaigns and hunter training remain limited in many regions, contributing to underreporting, low compliance, and insufficient risk perception. Key challenges include lack of hunter engagement, insufficient testing facilities, and variable penalties for non-compliance. To mitigate risks, we recommend harmonizing surveillance strategies, expanding education and communication initiatives, ensuring accessible and affordable testing, and strengthening collaboration between veterinary authorities and hunting communities. Such measures are essential to reduce the zoonotic risk of trichinellosis linked to privately consumed wild boar meat in Europe.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis publication is based upon work from COST Action Safety in the Game Meat Chain (SafeGameMeat, CA22166), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceFood and Waterborne Parasitologyen_US
dc.subjectEuropeen_US
dc.subjectPrivate consumptionen_US
dc.subjectTrichinellaen_US
dc.subjectWild boaren_US
dc.subjectZoonosisen_US
dc.subjectHuntingen_US
dc.subjectGame meaten_US
dc.titleTrichinella detection in wild boar meat intended for private consumption: Insights from a European studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.fawpar.2026.e00358
dc.citation.volume44en_US
dc.citation.spagee00358en_US
dc.citation.rankM21aen_US
dc.type.versionpublisheden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY