Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHanin, Marie C.
dc.contributor.authorQueenan, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorSavić, Sara
dc.contributor.authorKarimuribo, Esron
dc.contributor.authorRüegg, Simon R.
dc.contributor.authorHäsler, Barbara
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-15T19:41:32Z
dc.date.available2019-12-15T19:41:32Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationHanin MCE, Queenan K, Savic S, Karimuribo E, Rüegg SR and Häsler B (2018) A One Health Evaluation of the Southern African Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance. Front. Vet. Sci. 5:33. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00033en_US
dc.identifier.issn2296-1769
dc.identifier.urihttps://repo.niv.ns.ac.rs/xmlui/handle/123456789/218
dc.description.abstractRooted in the recognition that emerging infectious diseases occur at the interface of human, animal, and ecosystem health, the Southern African Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance (SACIDS) initiative aims to promote a trans-sectoral approach to address better infectious disease risk management in five countries of the Southern African Development Community. Nine years after SACIDS’ inception, this study aimed to evaluate the program by applying a One Health (OH) evaluation framework developed by the Network for Evaluation of One Health (NEOH). The evaluation included a description of the context and the initiative, illustration of the theory of change, identification of outputs and outcomes, and assessment of the One Healthness. The latter is the sum of characteristics that defines an integrated approach and includes OH thinking, OH planning, OH working, sharing infrastructure, learning infrastructure, and systemic organization. The protocols made available by NEOH were used to develop data collection protocols and identify the study design. The framework relies on a mixed methods approach by combining a descriptive and qualitative assessment with a semi-quantitative evaluation (scoring). Data for the analysis were gathered during a document review, in group and individual interviews and in an online survey. Operational aspects (i.e., OH thinking, planning, and working) were found to be balanced overall with the highest score in the planning dimension, whereas the infrastructure (learning infrastructure, systemic organization, and sharing infrastructure) was high for the first two dimensions, but low for sharing. The OH index calculated was 0.359, and the OH ratio calculated was 1.495. The program was praised for its great innovative energy in a difficult landscape dominated by poor infrastructure and its ability to create awareness for OH and enthuse people for the concept; training of people and networking. Shortcomings were identified regarding the balance of contributions, funds and activities across member countries in the South, lack of data sharing, unequal allocation of resources, top-down management structures, and limited horizontal collaboration. Despite these challenges, SACIDS is perceived to be an effective agent in tackling infectious diseases in an integrated manner.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was conducted in the frame of the European Cooperation on Science and Technology (COST) Action TD 1404 “Network for Evaluation of One Health” and cofunded by the Wellcome Trust grant WT087546MA.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.sourceFrontiers in veterinary scienceen
dc.subjectSouthern African Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillanceen_US
dc.subjectOne Healthen_US
dc.subjectevaluationen_US
dc.subjectcapacityen_US
dc.subjectsurveillanceen_US
dc.titleA one health evaluation of the Southern African Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillanceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fvets.2018.00033


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record