Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBouwknegt, Martijn
dc.contributor.authorDevleesschauwer, Brecht
dc.contributor.authorHeather, Graham
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, Lucy J.
dc.contributor.authorvan der Giessen¹, Joke WB
dc.contributor.authorPetrović, Jelena
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-31T13:33:52Z
dc.date.available2019-10-31T13:33:52Z
dc.date.issued2018-03
dc.identifier.citationBouwknegt Martijn, Devleesschauwer Brecht, Graham Heather, Robertson Lucy J, van der Giessen Joke WB, the Euro-FBP workshop participants. Prioritisation of food-borne parasites in Europe, 2016. Euro Surveill. 2018;23(9):pii=17-00161. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.9.17-00161en_US
dc.identifier.issn1560-7917
dc.identifier.urihttps://repo.niv.ns.ac.rs/xmlui/handle/123456789/73
dc.description.abstractPriority setting is a challenging task for public health professionals. To support health professionals with this and in following a recommendation from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO), 35 European parasitologists attended a workshop from 8–12 February 2016 to rank food-borne parasites (FBP) in terms of their importance for Europe and regions within Europe. Methods: Countries were divided into European regions according to those used by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. We used the same multicriteria decision analysis approach as the FAO/WHO, for comparison of results, and a modified version, for better regional representation. Twenty-five FBP were scored in subgroups, using predefined decision rules.  Results: At the European level, Echinococcus multilocularis ranked first, followed by Toxoplasma gondiiand Trichinella spiralis. At the regional level, E. multilocularis ranked highest in Northern and Eastern Europe, E. granulosus in SouthWestern and South-Eastern Europe, and  T. gondii  in Western Europe. Anisakidae, ranking 17th globally, appeared in each European region’s top 10. In contrast, Taenia solium, ranked highest globally but 10th for Europe. Conclusions: FBP of importance in Europe differ from those of importance globally, requiring targeted surveillance systems, intervention measures, and preparedness planning that differ across the world and across Europe.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was a collaboration within the framework of Euro-FBP, the European Network for Foodborne Parasites, COST Action FA1408.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.sourceEurosurveillanceen
dc.titlePrioritisation of food-borne parasites in Europe, 2016en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.9.17-00161


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record