Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBiebaut, Evelien
dc.contributor.authorŠtukelj, Marina
dc.contributor.authorChantziaras, Ilias
dc.contributor.authorPina Nunes, Telmo
dc.contributor.authorNedosekov, Vitalii
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Carla Correia
dc.contributor.authorMehmedi, Blerta
dc.contributor.authorCorrege, Isabelle
dc.contributor.authorOzsvari, Laszlo
dc.contributor.authorSvennesen, Line
dc.contributor.authorBernaerdt, Elise
dc.contributor.authorToppari, Ina
dc.contributor.authorGresakova, Lubomira
dc.contributor.authorRomanelli, Costanza
dc.contributor.authorFilippitzi, Maria Eleni
dc.contributor.authorMeling, Siv
dc.contributor.authorAngjelovski, Branko
dc.contributor.authorKüker, Susanne
dc.contributor.authorViltrop, Arvo
dc.contributor.authorĐidara, Mislav
dc.contributor.authorNikolić, Marko
dc.contributor.authorNicolaisen, Thies
dc.contributor.authorVink, Eline
dc.contributor.authorDahlin, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorKureljušić, Branislav
dc.contributor.authorBaraitareanu, Stelian
dc.contributor.authorAllepuz, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorProdanov-Radulović, Jasna
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-13T12:16:41Z
dc.date.available2025-02-13T12:16:41Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.issn0167-5877
dc.identifier.urihttps://repo.niv.ns.ac.rs/xmlui/handle/123456789/922
dc.description.abstractImplementing biosecurity measures in the pig production is crucial to optimize animal health and reduce antimicrobial usage. A legal framework may help to ensure all stakeholders understand the need of biosecurity measures and to implement them correctly. Limited knowledge is available about how implementation of biosecurity measures is regulated in European countries. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify which biosecurity measures were mandatory by national legislation and/or by pig sector organizations of European countries for the intensive pig production under normal circumstances (i.e. no (threat of) disease outbreaks). A questionnaire including 51 biosecurity measures, 32 on external and 19 on internal, was developed and sent to national country representatives. Twenty-four European countries, of which 18 belonging to the European Union, indicated which biosecurity measures were mandatory by law. Four countries, France, Spain, Italy and Romania had a single national pig-specific biosecurity legislation, while in the other countries multiple legislations had to be consulted to complete the questionnaire. In general, there was a high heterogeneity in the number of measures that were mandatory by law per country. Most biosecurity measures addressed in the national legislation focused on external biosecurity and were measures that can be easily audited when conducting a farm visit such as the presence of a hygiene lock, fencing around the farm and the existence of documentation. A significant (p < 0.001) positive correlation was observed between the presence of external and internal biosecurity measures in the legislation. Yet, no significant association was observed between the number of biosecurity measures present in the national legislation and the size of the pig production. Fourteen countries indicated which biosecurity measures were required by pig sector organizations for intensive pig farms. The median number of biosecurity measures mandatory by pig sector organizations but not by law was 13 with a minimum of one measure in Germany and a maximum of 24 in Croatia. Different countries apply different strategies to increase the level of biosecurity. Further research is needed to investigate the impact of the different strategies on the implementation of biosecurity on intensive pig farms in the countries.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis article is based upon work from COST Action BETTER, CA20103, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). This work was funded by the European Union under the Horizon Europe grant 101083923 (BIOSECURE). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Executive Agency (REA). Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.sourcePreventive Veterinary Medicineen_US
dc.subjectBiosecurity measuresen_US
dc.subjectDisease protectionen_US
dc.subjectEuropeen_US
dc.subjectIntensive pig productionen_US
dc.subjectLawen_US
dc.subjectMappingen_US
dc.titleLarge heterogeneity in biosecurity legislation in the intensive pig production across Europeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.citation.volume237en_US
dc.citation.rankM21en_US
dc.type.versionpublisheden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record