Methods to assess on-farm biosecurity in Europe and beyond

View/ Open
Date
2025Author
Duarte, Fernando
Tamminen, Lena-Mari
Kjosevski, Miroslav
Ciaravino, Giovanna
Delpont, Mattias
Correia-Gomes, Carla
van den Borne, Bart H.P.
Chantziaras, Ilias
Alarcon, Laura Valeria
Svennesen, Line
Toppari, Ina
Piccirillo, Alessandra
Gecaj, Rreze M.
Zbikowski, Artur
Nunes, Telmo
Prodanov-Radulović, Jasna
De Nardi, Marco
Nedosekov, Vitalii
Desvars-Larrive, Amelie
Allepuz, Alberto
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The aim of this study was to identify which biosecurity assessment methods (BAMs) are currently used in practice
in animal farms. To address this, a structured questionnaire was developed to gather information such as the
animal species, main objectives, type of enforcement, output generated and feedback of the result. In the context
of the BETTER Cost Action project, country representatives identified in each of their countries which BAMs were
used and completed an online survey. The survey was prepared and translated in 23 languages. Besides a
descriptive analysis, clusters of BAMs were determined using a multiple correspondence analysis. Responses,
collected between December 2022 and July 2023, included 74 BAMs used in 28 countries. Most of them were
used in a single country while three were used in multiple countries. This study provides a comprehensive picture
of existing BAMs and insights into their diversity, such as variations in objectives, implementation, evaluators,
respondents, feedback, or assessment outputs. Moreover, we identified four BAMs clusters differentiated by their
objective, evaluator and type of feedback provided. This study might also represent the basis for future research
on strengths and weaknesses of different BAMs.