Implementation of biosecurity measures according to legislation in intensive poultry production: An overview across 22 EU and non-EU countries
View/ Open
Date
2025Author
Qamer, Mahmood
Tilli, Giuditta
Laconi, Andrea
Vougat Ngom, Ronald
Leite, Marta
Prodanov-Radulović, Jasna
Allepuz, Alberto
COST BETTER Country Focal Points/Poultry Experts
Chantziaras, Ilias
Piccirillo, Alessandra
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Biosecurity implementation in poultry production is essential for maintaining flock health and preventing diseases. Regulatory frameworks play a key role in standardising biosecurity practices and ensuring compliance
among stakeholders. However, there is limited information on how biosecurity measures (BMs) are legally
enforced across different European countries. This study aimed to identify which BMs are mandated by legislation and/or other regulatory frameworks in 22 EU and non-EU countries for intensive poultry production.
Using a participatory approach involving poultry experts from these 22 countries, data collection and validation
were conducted through a questionnaire covering eleven biosecurity categories and comprising 56 BMs. The
survey was carried out between December 2022 and December 2023. The number of BMs mandated by legislation for all poultry species varied considerably across countries. Turkey (52), Ukraine (46), and Slovakia (38)
had the highest numbers, whereas Denmark, Sweden, and Finland had none. The most regulated BMs included
rodent control programs, cleaning and disinfection after each production cycle, and physical or natural farm
barriers. Conversely, the least regulated BMs included farm-exclusive personnel and external silo loading, with
no regulations concerning keeping other farm animals, poultry species, or pets. Broiler and layer farming were
subjected to more compulsory BMs than other poultry species. Additionally, twelve countries reported BMs under
other regulatory frameworks, with Serbia (55), Turkey (53), and Poland (49) having the highest numbers, while
Sweden (27), Finland (26), and Norway (25) had the lowest. The most regulated BMs included designated
clothing and footwear, hygiene locks, and clean house surroundings. The least regulated BMs were related to silo
loading, manure collection, and a parking area outside the farm. There was considerable variation in the number
and type of BMs mandated by legislation across countries, likely influenced by each country’s perceived disease
risk. These findings highlight the importance of establishing a harmonized biosecurity framework at the European level to address regulatory heterogeneity and enhance disease prevention in poultry production.