Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorQamer, Mahmood
dc.contributor.authorTilli, Giuditta
dc.contributor.authorLaconi, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorVougat Ngom, Ronald
dc.contributor.authorLeite, Marta
dc.contributor.authorProdanov-Radulović, Jasna
dc.contributor.authorAllepuz, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorCOST BETTER Country Focal Points/Poultry Experts
dc.contributor.authorChantziaras, Ilias
dc.contributor.authorPiccirillo, Alessandra
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-13T11:09:35Z
dc.date.available2025-06-13T11:09:35Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.issn0167-5877
dc.identifier.urihttps://repo.niv.ns.ac.rs/xmlui/handle/123456789/989
dc.description.abstractBiosecurity implementation in poultry production is essential for maintaining flock health and preventing diseases. Regulatory frameworks play a key role in standardising biosecurity practices and ensuring compliance among stakeholders. However, there is limited information on how biosecurity measures (BMs) are legally enforced across different European countries. This study aimed to identify which BMs are mandated by legislation and/or other regulatory frameworks in 22 EU and non-EU countries for intensive poultry production. Using a participatory approach involving poultry experts from these 22 countries, data collection and validation were conducted through a questionnaire covering eleven biosecurity categories and comprising 56 BMs. The survey was carried out between December 2022 and December 2023. The number of BMs mandated by legislation for all poultry species varied considerably across countries. Turkey (52), Ukraine (46), and Slovakia (38) had the highest numbers, whereas Denmark, Sweden, and Finland had none. The most regulated BMs included rodent control programs, cleaning and disinfection after each production cycle, and physical or natural farm barriers. Conversely, the least regulated BMs included farm-exclusive personnel and external silo loading, with no regulations concerning keeping other farm animals, poultry species, or pets. Broiler and layer farming were subjected to more compulsory BMs than other poultry species. Additionally, twelve countries reported BMs under other regulatory frameworks, with Serbia (55), Turkey (53), and Poland (49) having the highest numbers, while Sweden (27), Finland (26), and Norway (25) had the lowest. The most regulated BMs included designated clothing and footwear, hygiene locks, and clean house surroundings. The least regulated BMs were related to silo loading, manure collection, and a parking area outside the farm. There was considerable variation in the number and type of BMs mandated by legislation across countries, likely influenced by each country’s perceived disease risk. These findings highlight the importance of establishing a harmonized biosecurity framework at the European level to address regulatory heterogeneity and enhance disease prevention in poultry production.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research work was funded and conducted within COST Action CA20103, Biosecurity Enhanced Through Training Evaluation and Raising Awareness (BETTER), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.sourcePreventive Veterinary Medicineen_US
dc.subjectBiosecurityen_US
dc.subjectDisease preventionen_US
dc.subjectBroileren_US
dc.subjectEuropeen_US
dc.subjectLayeren_US
dc.subjectLegislationen_US
dc.subjectRegulatory frameworksen_US
dc.subjectPoultryen_US
dc.titleImplementation of biosecurity measures according to legislation in intensive poultry production: An overview across 22 EU and non-EU countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106571
dc.citation.volume242en_US
dc.citation.epage106571en_US
dc.citation.rankM21en_US
dc.type.versionpublisheden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record